• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Annexes G and H of the Dutch Seismic Practice Directive NPR9998

    Thumbnail
    Download
    PDF (902.3Kb)
    Date
    2020-04-22
    Authors
    Fox, Matthew
    Muir, Craig
    Baird, Andrew
    Beazley, Peter
    Kam, Weng Yuen
    Jury, Rob
    Sharpe, Richard
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The province of Groningen in the north-east of the Netherlands is currently experiencing a period of induced seismicity as the result of sustained gas extraction from an underlying gas field. These anthropogenic earthquakes have triggered the need to assess, and where necessary retrofit, the relatively vulnerable building stock. As the Netherlands is not historically a seismic country, there was a lack of seismic guidelines and hence the practice directive NPR9998 was developed to meet the needs of this rather unique situation. A key part of NPR9998 is the Annexes G and H, which enable engineers to undertake Nonlinear Pushover Analysis and Nonlinear Kinematic Analysis, respectively. Both annexes are tailored towards expedited assessments and are based on section C8 of New Zealand’s Technical Guidelines for (seismic) Engineering Assessments. The paper starts with an overview of the induced seismicity situation in Groningen and the need to assess and strengthen houses. The development of NPR9998 Annexes G and H is then presented, with a specific focus on how it addresses societal needs in the Groningen region. Following this, discussion is provided around differences to the New Zealand Guidelines before looking into the more innovative aspects of the annexes’ development, which include comparison against shake table tests and calibration to the results of detailed seismic risk analyses.
    URI
    https://repo.nzsee.org.nz/handle/nzsee/1717
    Published in
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback