• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2022 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2022 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The shaky south (or not): towards improving communities understanding of earthquake risk in Otago and Southland

    Thumbnail
    Download
    PDF (234.3Kb)
    Date
    2022-04-27
    Authors
    Johnston, David
    Orchiston, Caroline
    Becker, Julia
    Vinnell, Lauren
    Kaiser, Lucy
    Stewart, Joshua
    Lake-Hammond, Alice
    Stirling, Mark
    Tapuke, Kelvin
    Akther, Marufa
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Understanding how people interpret and respond to earthquake risks is vital to any strategy for earthquake risk reduction. Acknowledging that there is a wide range of interpretations of risk is important in determining how we understand acceptable risk, and prompt preparedness and other mitigation measures. Acceptable risk in the context of safety involves interactions between natural (physical and engineering) and human factors. This is a challenge for Otago and Southland because these regions lie in what is described as ‘low seismic hazard zones’ compared to other more seismically active parts of Aotearoa New Zealand. Consequently, public perceptions of seismic hazard are likely to downplay the risk, even though this relatively low seismic hazard is still high compared to other countries given the whole of NZ lies on an active tectonic plate interface. In 2016, a postal survey was used to investigate community understanding of earthquake risk in Oamaru and Dunedin. Results show that although most respondents had no personal experience of a significant earthquake (Dunedin: 80%, Oamaru: 65%), the majority agreed that preparing for earthquakes will improve their ability to deal with disruptions to community life following an earthquake (Dunedin and Oamaru: both 78%). This paper presents the results of the 2016 survey and highlights the need for further discussion in terms of current earthquake policy and practices at national and regional levels. Challenges and opportunities for earthquake risk reduction in Otago and Southland have relevance for other lower seismic zones in Aotearoa New Zealand, such as Auckland and Northland.
    URI
    https://repo.nzsee.org.nz/handle/nzsee/2495
    Published in
    • Proceedings of the 2022 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback