• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2023 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2023 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of prioritization schemes for bridge stock assessment

    Thumbnail
    Download
    PDF (210.2Kb)
    Date
    2023-04-19
    Authors
    Hamidpour, Sara
    Scattarreggia, Nicola
    Nascimbene, Roberto
    Monteiro, Ricardo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The important role of bridges in transportation network resiliency has made the management of the existing bridge stock an essential task. In order to implement and prioritise the activities to secure the proper performance of large numbers of existing bridges, it is necessary to go through a complex process of condition assessment and decision-making for identifying the relative priority of the bridges within a network. The prioritization of bridges serves the decision-making agencies to understand and compare the current structural condition and expected performance of a bridge for objectives such as monitoring, maintenance, retrofitting or even replacement. In this sense, the methods used for bridge prioritization typically identify, weigh and analyse a variety of parameters to quantify the vulnerability of a bridge, referring to service loads, seismic, hydraulic, and geotechnical actions, as well as structural conditions in terms of deficiencies and material degradation. In this paper, some of the most common approaches, employed by different standards and regulations in different countries worldwide, for bridge prioritization are compared and discussed. The approaches are reviewed in terms of required input data, condition evaluation procedure, computational method, and corresponding strengths and weaknesses. The outcome of such a review enables a more informed decision on the best methodologies to adopt or points towards a combination of them, if required.
    URI
    https://repo.nzsee.org.nz/handle/nzsee/2620
    Published in
    • Proceedings of the 2023 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback