• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Recommendations for the revision of the approach for seismic design of parts and components in New Zealand design standards

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2025-03-01
    Authors
    Haymes, Kieran
    Sullivan, Timothy J.
    Hare, John
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This work makes recommendations for revision of the design provisions for the seismic demands on non- structural elements, parts and components in the New Zealand seismic loading standard. The proposed approach seeks to incorporate new and international knowledge of the factors affecting seismic demands on non-structural elements, but also maintaining simplicity to facilitate adoption. The most significant changes include new expressions for the influence of floor height and building nonlinear response on floor acceleration demands; the amplification of demands on flexible parts due to dynamic amplification associated with the response of structural modes; and potential reductions in part strength requirements by permitting nonlinear part response. The proposed revisions are supported by data from instrumented buildings, numerical modelling and experimental testing. Comparisons between the recommended and existing NZS 1170.5 approaches are presented that show that the proposed approach will lead to reduced design actions in many cases and increased loads in others. Greater demands are prescribed for flexible parts with limited ductile capacity and some parts at the serviceability limit state design level. Conversely, design forces reduce for rigid parts; parts and components on lower levels of buildings; ductile flexible parts; parts in ductile buildings at the ultimate limit state design; and parts with long periods. Finally, the proposed approach is compared with the most recent updates to the code design approaches in Europe and the United States to provide an international context of the state of the art.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1661
    Published in
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback