| dc.creator | Zabolotnii, Elena | en |
| dc.creator | Dirikolu, Tarik | en |
| dc.creator | Kumar, Jeeva Subramaniam | en |
| dc.creator | Venter, Julian | en |
| dc.creator | Read, John | en |
| dc.date | 2025-09-02 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-14T20:44:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-14T20:44:51Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://bulletin.nzsee.org.nz/article/view/1702 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.5459/bnzsee.1702 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repo.nzsee.org.nz/xmlui/handle/nzsee/2879 | |
| dc.description | The legislated use of pseudo-static analysis in many jurisdictions mandates its continued application by practitioners. This paper offers guidance to slope stability practitioners on the use the method’s three-dimensional formulation to meet Design Acceptance Criteria. The paper demonstrates that three-dimensional seismic k-coefficients cannot be used as 1:1 substitutes to meet historically established DAC and presents a case for developing the correct equivalencies. The case study of the recovery design along Wall 375 along New Zealand’s State Highway No. 1 in the aftermath of the Kaikoura earthquake is used for illustrative purposes. | en |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering | en |
| dc.relation | https://bulletin.nzsee.org.nz/article/view/1702/1514 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2025 Elena Zabolotnii, Tarik Dirikolu, Jeeva Subramaniam Kumar, Julian Venter, John Read | en |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en |
| dc.source | Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering; Vol. 58 No. 3 (2025); 187-196 | en |
| dc.source | 2324-1543 | |
| dc.source | 1174-9857 | |
| dc.title | The applicability of 3D effects to pseudo-static design acceptance criteria: The recovery design for Wall 375 | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Article | en |
